We're
always trying to figure out why IT is vilified and degraded by the "cost
center" label uttered by CEOs, CFOs and other senior leaders. ("But,
but...we're not really true business partners?!")
The way I see it, the
number-one reason for such executive disdain
is due to ERP systems, and what
I'll refer to as the "3 C's"—cost,complexity and customization.
A new CFO Research Services survey of 157 senior finance
executives, which specifically looked at initial and ongoing ERP system ownership costs,
illustrates this point beautifully.
For starters, companies
are more than likely shocked and awed by the initial acquisition and implementationcosts of ERP
systems. The CFO study focused primarily on midsize companies (with $100
million to $1 billion in annual revenues), and half of the respondents said
they spent more than $1 million for the license,
service and first year's maintenance on their current ERP system. Nine out
of ten respondents said they spent a minimum of $250,000. (Of course, as the
report notes, the actual costs are even higher: the estimates didn't include
the internal costs for rolling out the system, such as for project management,
user training and IT support.)
So if the CFO and CEO
can stomach that kind of initial capital outlay—and most can—there's much, much
more to contend with around the corner, namely thorny and expensive
customization issues, upgrade decisions and annualmaintenance fees.
Customization is a fact
of life with ERP systems, so companies are supposed to take the good, take the
bad, you take them both and there you have your ERP system. In fact, eight out
of ten respondents reported that their companies "have customized their
ERP systems either moderately or extensively in order to adapt the product to
the company's unique business requirements," according to the CFO study.
What were they doing?
States the study: Adding modules and functionality, rewriting core
applications, modifying outputs, improving system performance and updating the
technology.
In other words, these
companies weren't customizing their ERP apps just for the fun of it. They were
trying to stay in business.
"Companies grow and
change, acquiring new business lines and divesting themselves of others,"
notes the CFO study. "They open new facilities or consolidate operations,
add partners or outsource functions, centralize or decentralize the back
office. Reporting requirements increase as regulatory bodies heighten oversight
and as companies expand across borders.
"In short," it
continues, "businesses change, and as they do, so do management's
information needs."
So just how much does
this cost? A typical company in the CFO survey will spend an average of $1.2
million each year (each year!) to maintain, modify and update its ERP system.
Desperate
Times, Desperate Measures
ERP systems have become
a noose around companies' necks which tighten as the business changes every
year, each customization gets made to the system and costs continue to spiral
upward.
Some CFOs, according to
the survey, have had enough of customizations. Instead, they are following a
new (and potentially dangerous, in my opinion) policy: Keep everything vanilla.
Said one manufacturing
CFO, in the survey: "Change your processes to best practices and follow
shrink-wrapped solutions." Another finance chief surveyed has taken an
even more extreme position: "Our policy is that we will not make custom
modifications to the software; we will modify the business process if necessary
or create an offline procedure."
"Application
Flexibility" selling point, ERPvendors.
While I understand the
logic behind those CFO strategies, I can foresee an unintended consequence
right around the corner: Those rank-and-file employees who actually have to use
the ERP system day in, day out will not only dislike the fact that you're
changing their technology interface, but now you're going to allow the
technology system to dictate to them how they should perform their job, with
the new business processes?
Yikes.
Of course, CFOs and CEOs
shouldn't be excluded from any culpability in creating these financial black
holes—they are the ones who approved the ERP projects in the first place.
But, perhaps, they have
been making these decisions withoutknowing all the facts about the long-termcosts associated with ERP systems, that the upfront "sticker
price" is almost meaningless.
Which brings us right
back to why CFOs and CEOs hate IT.
Source: http://advice.cio.com
No comments:
Post a Comment